Gandhis philosophy of non violence essay

Concept of partition[ edit ] As a rule, Gandhi was opposed to the concept of partition as it contradicted his vision of religious unity. The best defence is one where the victim is protected, as well as the attacker is respected and not injured if possible. Some of his economic policies were criticised for removing the right of property and freedoms from the landowning peasants of Gujarat for whom Gandhi had fought in the early s.

Gandhi alleged that if society acted out a mutual cooperation it would show that society and the people in it are equal.

In order to be heard by one's opponents, one must also be prepared to listen. More essays like this: Without faith there is no hope, and without hope there is suffering. But, it was Indian culture that was emphasized by him.

Non-violence, Truth and Love are identical. Using the fast as a form of significant symbolism, he justifies it as "a fast which a votary of non-violence sometimes feels impelled to undertake by way of protest against some wrong done by society, and this he does when as a votary of Ahimsa has no other remedy left.

Sarvodaya is a term meaning 'universal uplift' or 'progress of all'. Most people who are acting out in violence are angry or sad and just want to bring out the aggression on someone or something.

In fact we find elements of all these three philosophies in his views on education. Where there is nonviolence, there is Truth, and Truth is God. His aim, therefore, is spiritual and not material.

This in other words meant development of whole child, the whole personality of the child. Hence, he preached that only the law of Love should guide all life. He did not feel a need to take sides with world powers. He admitted in his autobiography to hitting his wife when he was young, [23] and indulging in carnal pleasures out of lust, jealousy and possessiveness, not genuine love.

Martin Luther King wrote, "Nonviolent resistance Another practice that Gandhi introduced was the use of the spinning wheel in his village in India.

Gandhi, for example, considers this debate about non-violence and lawful violence as a mere metaphor for the internal war within each human being, when he or she faces moral questions. This would mean to him development of such qualities in the individual as purity of personal life, self-restraint, and service of humanity, courage, strength of conviction, righteousness and sense of responsibility.

If one is pure, Gandhi believed that they would not be acting out in violent forms. Gandhi disliked having a cult following, and was averse to being addressed as Mahatmaclaiming that he was not a perfect human being.

These discussions have led to theories of just war, theories of reasonable self-defence and theories of proportionate punishment.

How did Gandhi win?

As a child Gandhi did eat meat, but later on in his life he preformed one of his practices of vegetarianism. This struggle was inaugurated when the military dismissed the results of the democratic elections and imposed military rule.


Anyway, we know how a bloodless revolution, non-military in its character, unprecedented in the history of the world, was led by Gandhiji through the application of the principle of Ahimsa and Satyagraha. The good of the society, according to him, was contingent upon the goodness of each individual.

Even suggested exceptions — ritual slaughter and hunting — were challenged by advocates of Ahimsa. All humanity is therefore, one. Gandhi believed this would stop the mind in its evil wanderings. Nehru had neglected the defence budget and disallowed the Army to prepare, which caught the soldiers in India's north eastern frontier off-guard with lack of supplies and reinforcements.

It entails power of the spirit, the power of truth and power of love. Essay on the Criticism of “Gandhism” (Gandhi’s Philosophy) Article shared by 1. Lack of Originality: Gandhiji was the first one to introduce non-violence into the political field and he also made successful use of it.’ He declared punishment immoral.

Words Essay on The Philosophy of Non-Violence. Ahimsa or Non-violence: Mahatma Gandhi was the exponent of the cult of Ahimsa or Non-violence. Like the Buddha, Christ and Chaitanya he too believed in the ultimate victory of Non-violence over violence.

Force or violence, according to him, is madness which cannot sustain. And this philosophy is his philosophy of non-violence.

It was a weapon he used to fight the odds, the evils and all the things bad with others and themselves, and this philosophy emerged as the powerful tool for positive social change.

Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence (ahimsa) and non-violent action (satyagraha) is constituted by a number of fundamental principles. Thomas Berton, having dedicated his life being drawn into a dialogue between Eastern and Western religions and viewpoints, has made a lot of research on the matter.

- Mahatma Gandhi’s Role in India’s Fight for Independence “The strongest physical force bends before moral force when used in the defense of truth.” - Mahatma Gandhi (Bondurant). Mahatma Gandhi was the main leader in helping India become independent through the principles of non violence, self-rule, and the unity of Hindus and Muslims.

Nonviolence is the personal practice of being harmless to self and others under every condition. It comes from the belief that hurting people, animals or the environment is unnecessary to achieve an outcome and refers to a general philosophy of abstention from violence.

Gandhis philosophy of non violence essay
Rated 3/5 based on 38 review
Gandhism - Wikipedia